North Darfur, Sudan
Results from surveys conducted at lower adminstrative level
2025-03-28
- Um Kaddada had 97.5% of data missing GPS coordinates –> Excluded from the analysis
- El Lait had 46% of the data missing GPS coordinates
Results
El Fasher & Tawila
Spatial Variation of GAM by WFHZ
Predicted Estimates of GAM by WFHZ
Observed Locality prevalence estimates vs predicted prevalence
| El Fasher |
19.74 |
24.34 |
4.6 |
1.34 |
41.32 |
24.48 |
| Tawila |
26.58 |
21.69 |
-4.9 |
1.64 |
43.55 |
23.59 |
Did the Model Fit the Data?
R² = 0.918
- Almost perfect positive correlation
Spatial Variation of GAM by MUAC
Predicted Estimates of GAM by MUAC
Observed Locality prevalence estimates vs predicted prevalence
| El Fasher |
21.10 |
19.63 |
-1.47 |
1.35 |
41.33 |
23.87 |
| Tawila |
21.95 |
21.87 |
-0.08 |
1.91 |
43.73 |
23.16 |
Did the Model fit the Data?
R² = 0.917
- Almost perfect positive correlation
Results
Al Lait & At Tawisha
Spatial Variation of GAM by WFHZ
Predicted Estimates of GAM by WFHZ
⚠️ Values in columns 3, 5-7 need to be revised when I get a Shapefile that splits El Lait and El Taweisha localities into two
| El Lait |
24.78 |
23.97 |
-0.81 |
4.34 |
45.99 |
26.27 |
| El Taweisha |
28.85 |
23.97 |
-4.89 |
4.34 |
45.99 |
26.27 |
Did the Model Fit the Data?
R² = 0.668
- Positive and strong correlation
Spatial Variation of GAM by MUAC
Predicted Estimates of GAM by MUAC
⚠️ Values in columns 3, 5-7 need to be revised when I get a Shapefile that splits El Lait and El Taweisha localities into two
| El Lait |
17.67 |
23.97 |
6.30 |
6.68 |
44.13 |
26.28 |
| El Taweisha |
22.75 |
23.97 |
1.21 |
6.68 |
44.13 |
26.28 |
Did the Model fit the Data?
R² = 0.66
- Positive and strong correlation
